Humans today have trouble with the notion of ‘one thing’. We are constantly taking, and trying to control nature. For the case of food we try to “make the deserts bloom and put an end to world poverty” (Otero, 27). When bringing up this act of world greed we can not help wonder if it is bought on by society. How did we become so focused on money as some people suffer? I think it is time we stop focusing on the monetary profit of farming and focus on how to profit the people.
If we continue living as we do today, raping the worlds resources from oceans to mountains and jungles to forests, problems will arise. We all know that with the rise of population and global warming, food crisis and famine go hand in hand. It must be noted that in this discussion I will focus on the exploitation of the global South by the global North. As everyone is trying to make a buck. It is evident that, “[humans will] carry this revolution forward even if it destroys the entire world” (Qinn, 217). In other words the world will be consumed by our greed and want for “more”.
The film Darwin’s Nightmare, directed by Hubert Sauper, is a perfect example of the greed and domination of the global North and how it directly effects the global south. In the poverty struck town of Mwanza, Tanzania, located on the southeastern shores of Lake Victoria the fishing industry is the main economy of the town. Hundreds of tons of fish are exported every year. The fish factories process thousands of fish a day to be loaded on to daily flights headed to the global North later to feed a family in Europe or Russia. As cargo planes arrive empty and leave full of fish, beggars outside fight for rice and fish scraps from the factory. This short description of the film proves that “[t]he idea…that we can solve the food crisis by simply increasing yields is problematic in a world where most people go hungry, not because there isn’t plentiful food, but because they can not afford what food exists” (Otero, 30). If we added more fish to Lake Victoria and focused on the town of Mwanza, the only thing that will change is the number of fish processing plants in the town, and some more zeros and comas on the total number of tons exported. There would still be children begging outside, and there will still be people who cannot afford to buy food. A more local example of this is that, “[i]mporting cheaply produced transgenics did nothing to shield Mexican from the onslaught of high corn prices: when prices increased by 15% […] consumption dipped by 30%” (Otero, 30). When the United States gave Mexico genetically mortified seeds more crops were produced. All that meant was the more crops were exported. The people still went hungry.
If you take a look around nature and include humans, “[… you’ll see some creatures who act as though the world belongs to them and some creatures who act as though they belong to the world…” (Quinn 245). I believe that if we can belong more to the world, for example let the city of Mwzana eat their fresh fish, and let the People of Europe catch their own fish to eat. If we support the small-scale producers we can help feed millions of peasant families, keep the farmers on the land. Also small-scale local farming have positive effects on the environment and local farming is known to help preserve plant diversity. Findings, “…support the view that, while agricultural production and productivity are increasing, the benefits of capitalizes farming are not necessarily accruing to small farmers or the hungry” (Otero, 30). We must stop the production of genetically modified seeds in order to have bigger fruits and vegetables.
The change has to start somewhere, and I think that change should begin on a local level. If everyone who reads this blog becomes more conscious about what they buy, and focuses on locally grown food we can make a difference. However we can only start the change. I believe that there will continue to be “more than enough food” but as long as farming stays focused on making a buck people will always be hungry
WORKS CITED
Otero, Gerardo, and Gabriela Penchlaner. “Is Biotechnology the Answer? The Evidence
From NAFTA.” NACLA Report on the Americans 42.3 (2009): 27-31. Print.
Quinn, Daniel. Ishmael. New York: Bantam/Turner, 1992. Print
Environmental Communications 