Posts Tagged ‘local’


fig. 1- Proposed Gateway Project retrieved from http://wildernesscommittee.org/gateway_freeways

 By Georgia Campbell

British Columbia’s already vulnerable salmon populations are put increasingly at risk through the provinces “Gateway Program”.  The Gateway Program is a plan to build and expand highways, bridges, railroads, rail yards, and port facilities, encouraging trade with Asia-Pacific (Cuff 2007).  Unfortunately, this development will have an extreme impact on our air quality, our marine and river habitat, and our local wildlife (Ibid).  Specifically, the Gateway Program will have an adverse affect on our pacific salmon populations through the construction of a major highway known as the South Fraser Perimeter Road (Ibid).

The South Fraser Perimeter Road (SFPR) is a proposed highway that will follow the south side of the Fraser River (see fig. 1). The Fraser River watershed drains almost one-third of the province, extends from the Rocky Mountains to the mouth in Vancouver, and spans a distance of 1,400 km (Rand et al 2006).  The Fraser River is the largest salmon-producing river system in Canada (Farrell et al 2008) and a large contributor to our provincial economy (Cox & Hinch 1997).   By building a highway along the Fraser River, salmon populations will be affected in three main ways: through highway construction, highway presence, and increased urbanization (Wheeler et al 2005). This will, in turn, negatively affect our local economy and provincial food security.

Presently, our salmon populations are barely sustainable and are increasingly vulnerable to environmental changes. The collapse of our BC sockeye salmon population this year has created an extreme problem for First Nations food security and for the provincial economy.  BC’s Fraser River this August expected 10.6-13 million sockeye salmon returning to natal spawning grounds and only 1.7 returned (Hume 2009).  The collapse caused sockeye fisheries on the Fraser River to close in July, causing a serious problem for First Nation’s communities who relay on salmon for sustenance and a principal source of protein (Karp 2009).  Increased construction, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions produced by the new South Perimeter Road highway will only increase the fragility of the salmon ecosystems, and decrease the resiliency and sustainability of our local salmon.

Our local salmon populations are born in the freshwater headwaters of the Fraser River.  Once mature enough, the salmon migrate to the ocean northward to the Gulf of Alaska (Cox & Hinch 1997).  Once reproductively mature (about 4 years of age), the salmon use precise homing skills to return to the Fraser River and their natal streams to spawn and, after which, die (Ibid; Rand et al 2006).  Because sockeye salmon only spawn once in their lifetime, it is crucial that they succeed in their homeward migration in order to propagate.  The SFPR will interfere with the migration of both sea-bound juvenile salmon and stream-bound spawning salmon, and decrease salmons’ ability to survive and propagate.

During the SFPR highway construction, an increased amount of sediment will likely enter the Fraser River (Wheeler et al 2005) harming migratory salmon (Lake & Hinch 1999).  Research shows that “fine sediment pollution from highway construction can immediately alter macroinvertebrate and fish communities” (Wheeler et al 2005, 145), and can reduce the amount of fish by 50% (Ibid).  Sediment has such a profound effect on fish because it can clog gills causing severe damage, thus reducing feeding abilities and oxygen consumption (Ibid), and can cause anoxia, stress, and eventually death (Lake & Hinch 1999).

Along with sediments, highway construction will also introduce harmful pollutants into the waterway (Wheeler et al 2005).  During construction the use of heavy machinery can cause chemical pollution, and materials used for highway construction are “highly toxic to aquatic biota” (Wheeler et al 2005, 144).  Because of proximity, this pollution will surely enter the Fraser River and pollute salmon habitat (Wilderness Committee n.d.).

Extended use of the highway—referred to as highway presence—will continue to pollute the river and harm salmon populations.  Highway and road surfaces are impervious in nature, and therefore accumulate chemical pollutants and heavy metals from automotive traffic (Wheeler et al 2005).  These pollutants, including zinc, iron, lead, cadmium, nickel, copper, chromium, phosphorus, and petroleum (Ibid) are then transported into the river by stormwater (Sandahl et al 2007).  Studies show that chemical concentrations are directly related to traffic volumes (Wheeler et al 2005).  Thus, projected traffic increases on the SFPR will only increase pollution levels, and affect salmon in numerous ways.

Toxic chemicals can increase the viability and infectivity of parasites (Couillard et al 2008).  This has extreme implications on salmon because they are already prone to numerous fatal parasites that can cause kidney failure, and severe gill damage (Crossin et al 2008).  Further, studies suggest that exposure to chemicals, such as PCBs, can trigger migration earlier than historically observed (Couillard et al 2008).  Early migration has had detrimental effects on salmon populations as they are making their migration during warmer than average periods, which is potentially lethal as salmon are a cold-water species, and sensitive to even slight changes in temperature (Ibid).

Lastly, copper in urban runoff damages the olfactory sensory epithelium in pacific salmon (Sandahl et al 2007).  A major source of copper in runoff is emissions from automotive exhaust and brake pad wear (Couillard et al 2008).  Studies show that “copper is a neurobehavioral toxicant in fish” (Sandahl et al 2007, 2998) damaging their olfactory sensors that they rely on to detect food, navigate to natal spawning grounds, and avoid predators (Ibid).  Mortality rates will therefore increase as salmon will be unable to detect chemical alarm cues and predators, find food, or find natal spawning grounds (Ibid).  Exposure to even modest amounts of copper can cause permanent damage (Ibid).

Studies show that highway growth encourages “sprawling development” and increases urbanization (Cuff 2007).  In turn, this will increase the amount of harmful pollutants being emitted into our atmosphere and our aquatic environments.  Because copper has a wide variety of industrial, commercial and residential uses, copper in urban runoff will continue to increase with urban expansion (Sandahl et al 2007).  As our salmon become increasingly exposed to heavy metals, toxic chemicals, and PCB’s our local food security will continue to be affected.  By consuming contaminated fish people put their own health at risk, impinging on peoples right to food security, food sovereignty, and access to local healthy food—that is if pacific salmon will even be available to consumer.

Because of the Gateway Project, GHG emissions are predicted to increase by 31% (Cuff 2007).  Global warming resulting from an increase in GHG emissions will further increase water temperatures and thus increase salmon mortality in BC.  Increased water temperatures cause extreme exhaustion, energy depletion (Crossin et al 2008), smaller stock size (Cox et al 2008), and susceptibility to disease in Pacific salmon (Crossin et al 2008).  This will therefore decrease reproductive capabilities and increase mortality rates.

Through highway construction, presence, and inevitable urbanization, Gateway’s SFPR will damage the Fraser River and cause mortality among pacific salmon.  Our provincial salmon are currently declining at alarming rates, proving they are living in an already fragile ecosystem.  The SFPR will only contribute to this fragility by polluting the Fraser River, increasing sedimentation, and increasing water temperatures through global warming.  In the face of the Gateway Program, our local salmon have little to no chance of survival—negatively affecting our regions biodiversity, economy and food security.


Couillard, Catherine M., Robie W. Macdonald, Simon C. Courtenay, Vince P. Palace. 2008. Chemical—environment interactions affecting the risk of impacts on aquatic organisms: A review with a Canadian perspective—interactions affecting exposure. Environmental Review, 16: 1-17.

Cox, Sean P., Scott G. Hinch. 1997. “Changes in size at maturity of Fraser River sockeye salmon (Onchorhynchus nerka) (1952-1993) and associations with temperature.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1159-1165.

Crossin, G.T., S.G. Hinch, S.J. Cooke, D.W. Welch, D.A. Patterson, S.R.M. Jones, A.G. Lotto, R.A. leggatt, M.T. Mathes, J.M. Shrimpton, G. Van Der Kraak, and A.P. Farrell. 2008. “Exposure to high temperature influences the behaviour, physiology, and survival of sockeye salmon during spawning migration.” Canadian Journal of Zoology 86:127-140.

Cuff, Nick. 2007. Gateway to global warming. Wilderness Committee Educational Report, 26.2

Farrell, A.P., S.G. Hinch, S.J. Cooke, D.A. Patterson, G.T. Crossin, M. lapointe, M.T. Mathes. 2008. “Pacific Salmon in hot Water: Applying Aerobic Scope Models and Biotelemetry to Predict the Success of Spawning Migrations. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 81(6): 697-708

Hume, Mark. 2009. Fraser River’s salmon stocks ‘beyond a crisis.’ Globe and Mail, online, 13 August 2009.


Karp, David. 2009. Sockeye salmon numbers crash as bust replaces anticipated bounty on B.C. coast. Vancouver Sun, online, 27 July 2009. <http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Sockeye+salmon+numbers+crash+bust+replaces+anticipated+bounty+coast/1832698/story.html&gt;

Lake, Randal G., Scott G. Hinch. 1999. Acute effects of suspended sediment angularity on juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal of FIsheries and Aquatic Science, 5:862-867.

Rand, P.S., S.G. Hinch, J. Morrison, M.G.G. Foreman, M.J. MacNutt, J.S. Macdonald, M.C. Healey, A.P. Farrell, D.A. Higgs. 2006.  “Effects of River Discharge, Temperature, and Future Climates on Energetics and Mortality of Adult Migrating Fraser River Sockeye Salmon.”  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135: 655-667.

Sandahl, Jason F., David H. Baldwin, Jeffrey J. Jenkins, Nathaniel L. Scholz. 2007. A Sensory System at the Interface between urban Stormwater Runoff and Salmon Survival.  Environmental Science and Technology, 41: 2998-3004.

Wheeler, Andrew P., Paul L. Angermeier, Amanda E. Rosenberger. 2005. Impacts of New Highways and Subsequent Landscape Urbanization on Stream habitat and Biota. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 13:141-164.

Wilderness Committee of Western Canada.  n.d.  Stop Gateway.  Retrieved online 15 November 2009 at <http://wildernesscommittee.org/gateway&gt;

Read Full Post »

With news shifting from harvest recipes to articles of ‘how to prepare your garden for the winter’ and the Vancouver’s summer farmers markets coming to a close, it is becoming less inspiring to cook with local produce. In order to see what a household might do during this season to beat out the rainy season blues I sauntered into a home where I knew some radical foodies resided.The Red House

Stepping in through the front door of the Red House I was glad to be out of the rain. It was that kind of rainy that only a Vancouver November could bring. I was welcomed into the cozy home and greeted by the smell of roasting squash and the faint sent of fermenting. The Red House is a communal house in Strathcona. All five housemates have agreed to cook weekly for each other and tonight is Alicia’s turn to make dinner. Alicia Gladman is a local food activist and foody at heart. When I asked her what kind of treat we were in for this evening, she replied. “I made a Roasted Butternut Squash with wild rice instead of the farro that the recipe called for and I added some rosemary too ‘cause who doesn’t like rosemary!?” She was cooking for the house and a few other guests so it was a real feast.

I asked Alicia to tell me about the meal we were going to eat. “I bought the squash at the winter farmers market. The wild rice we have [the house shares] came from the Maritimes, which is interesting that it’s even from this continent. And I used this rosemary that was given to me by the man at Union market [a local market that has fueled the neighbourhood for years]. He heard that I was making squash for dinner and went back into the garden and got me some rosemary!”

It is interesting that she spoke about where she acquired the main ingredients first. It says something about the thought process and politic that goes into her cooking. She then showed me the website that she often uses for inspiration. 101 Cookbooks is an aesthetically pleasing website and offers a search option to find recipes by ingredients, which is quite handy when attempting to keep it seasonal.

Alicia always attempts to cook with seasonal food and does her own canning. Having spent most of her youth in the Okanagan, Alicia has been surrounded by seasonal growers. “I grew up canning peaches and various other seasonal fruits and enjoy putting labour into canning in the summer and enjoying it in the winter.” She showed me cans of salsas, jams and chutneys made from tomatoes, plums, grapes and other produce and herbs from The Red House’s garden and other friend’s yards.

She then pointed out the two batches of home brew that were sitting in big buckets in the corner. “I’m brewing a winter ale and a pale ale right now.” We had time before dinner and I was able to help Alicia transfer the winter ale from the ‘primary’ bucket to the ‘secondary’ glass carboy. We added cinnamon, nutmeg and vanilla to give it that winter spicy goodness. Unfortunately we forgot that stirring in the spices would not be the best idea and lost a cup or two of brew to the foam that spewed out the top!

Finally sitting down to eat, I wanted to ask Alicia more specifically about her food purchasing politics. When posed with the question of buying local or organic Alicia responded, “I would choose local because I feel that there is more importance in localizing and developing relations within a local economy than buying organic, as organic can be green washing of the currently awful capitalist market. Buying local is a part of a greater revolution away from the current economic system and more directly addressed the problems within our food system.”

She continued, “If we actually want to change the relationship with our food and with each other there are systemic issues we have to address in our economic systems. Aside from being monetarily based, there are also larger social and political problems within our food system. By focusing locally in a food system, other things get considered such as the social wellbeing of the community, the local environment.”

Unfortunately the avocados and chickpeas of our kale salad had enormous food miles, and the spices we put in the beer were not from around here, but there is something to be said for the appreciation of ones own labour. The do it yourself (DIY) culture around homebrew, communal cooking and share houses seems to be a part of a larger localizing movement focusing around appreciating the labour that goes into the commodities we consume. Alicia’s efforts in supporting the winters farmers market, building relationships within her neighbourhood, sharing food and sharing the workload of maintaining her home are all small political acts that help to keep her food conscious mind at ease during this rainy season.

Rain jacket and boots back on, I trekked back through the cold wet to my own cozy home only to find movie-watching roomies taking another approach in dealing with this November lull.

Read Full Post »

It’s an interesting thing. I grew up in South Delta, a town about 40 km south of Vancouver, a region renowned for its extremely fertile farmland and agriculture. And it’s an interesting thing, because like most kids living in South Delta, I never knew where my food was coming from. Furthermore, I couldn’t have named a single crop-type lining the highway that was growing in the fields surrounding my community. It’s an interesting thing; we would drive past these fields every day, without a clue as to what grew there and who was consuming it. It seemed normal, seemed routine to acquire food from the local grocery store, and I did little wondering as a child to where it actually came from.

Agriculture is a big part of the economy in Delta, and it is notable that especially in the past five years that this large-scale agricultural landscape has undergone drastic transformations. This has to do mainly with the economic growth of the region, and with five major mass-development projects currently underway (in addition to the ones recently completed), the landscape and community of South Delta is currently undergoing major agricultural transformation and evolution.

The South Fraser Perimeter Road, the Port Expansion Development, the Southlands Development, the Tsawwassen Golf Course expansion and the Hothouse tomato expansion project are the projects that are directly affecting local production of agriculture. It’s unfortunate that the land that is being cleared for development is extremely arable and fertile, and has undergone soil sampling and testing to determine this. The projects currently underway in South Delta are breeding misdirection from where our community and our world needs to be.

The South Fraser Perimeter road is an extreme example of wide-scale development that will be deeply affecting everything from unparalleled wetlands, current family farms, high-potential arable land, and most deeply, Burns Bog. Burns Bog is one of North America’s largest carbon sinks near a major city, and it is an ecosystem that will be irreparable, says Environment Canada, if this project goes through.

Furthermore, the tomato hothouses have been recorded for mistreating employees, many of who are migrant workers from South America. Adriana Paz, from Bolivia, arrived in Canada and got a job working in a tomato greenhouse in South Delta, which happened to be one of the first in the province to request migrant farm workers from Mexico. Adriana mentioned in an interview that:

My first observation was that brown bodies are the pickers, while white bodies are the managers. I naively asked my boss why there are no Canadian picking tomatoes. He answered me simple, “because this is not a job for them”.

This deliberate discrimination is unacceptable and wrong. Not only are migrant workers being brought north to meet the growing demands of a hungry population, it is reinforcing cultural segregation and disconnection with the land our food grows on. We have become so distant from where our food comes from, and have seemingly fewer opportunities to become engaged with agriculture communities.

In spite of all this, growing mono-crops, loss and/or corporatization of farmland in the surrounding regions of South Delta can be seen as major factor of inspiration for a rising trend in the opposite direction, one focused on biodiversity and sustainable agriculture for community members. Earthwise Farm was established in 2005, right around the time many of these large-scale development projects were proposed and initiated.

Seeds of Hope: Earthwise Farm and Garden

The butterflies were out at dawn, dancing around the douglas aster bushes. The bees hovered above the marigold flowers, and a classroom of children was tending to their plot of green beans, spinach and carrots. Volunteers hoed the ground while the ocean waves crashed on the shore only biking seconds away. This is one of the most fertile areas of farmland in the Lower Mainland. To ‘revolutionize our food systems’ and ‘learn about the environmental benefits of sustainable farming practices’ are some of the main goals of the Lower Mainland neighborhood of South Delta’s community-based farm, Earthwise Garden.

Founded in 2005 and beginning with nothing but a chunk of blackberry-infested land and a select number of dedicated individuals, Earthwise has expanded in four years to become a sustainable agricultural and educational haven for students from Kindergarten up through University. Furthermore, it has become a full operational farm, including eco-tours, workshops, and events.

From July through September, nearly every single weekend there was some sort of event or celebration of local and organic agriculture. From Farmer’s Markets to a Grow Local Fair, to a Biodiversity weekend to exploring other farms in the South Delta area by bike, the movement is growing stronger than ever, while meanwhile, these massive development projects continue. South Delta has always been well-known as a farming community in the Lower Mainland; the growth and development of large-scale farming in South Delta is a major contributing factor to the rise and expansion of Earthwise Garden and the sustainable agriculture movement in the community.


Environmental Assessment Office, 2009 User Guide. BC Provincial Government. Accessed September 28,2009. http://www.eao.gov.bc.ca/pub/pdf/EAO_User_Guide_2009.pdf

RFP for South Fraser Perimeter Road. BC Provincial Government. Accessed September 29, 2009.

Gateway Program. BC Provincial Government. Accessed September 28, 2009.

Earthwise Society. DRS (Delta Recycling Society) Accessed September 26,2009. http://www.earthwisesociety.bc.ca/

Read Full Post »

For several years now, the controversy of genetically modified organisms (GMO) has been a great ally of writers and bloggers around the media world.  Many bloggers write about their opinions regarding GMO’s; some of the writers defend them but a vast majority attack and disbelieve that GMO’s are good for one’s health.  First and foremost, it is necessary to note that GMO’s are something new to our generation and for this reason many people consider them harmful and unethical.  However, one must ask if they are really malign because they are something that is new to us or because they really affect our health.
In my opinion, I believe that GMO’s are simply not healthy because they are genetically corrupted foods and the properties of the modified goods are changed and lost when they are altered. However, I must argue that ignorance and lack of knowledge on the matter in our society helps fuel the controversy of whether GMO’s are right or wrong.  Some people believe that GMO’s, if not controlled, will change the course of our generation. Whether it is for good or for bad that is yet to be seen, but what is certain is that they will play a major roll in future generations.
Some media bloggers argue that GMO’s can be beneficial in underdeveloped nations where not everyone has proper access to food. They believe that modified food can allow people to consume balanced diets, because modified goods can certainly permit them to eat all kinds of vital organisms.  An example of such benefit is adding vitamins to oranges in order to fight seasonal flues.
However, GMO’s can also be used to make people addicted to food, and this way allow food companies to take advantage of them.  Some fast food chains use GMO’s to make their products more profitable at the expense of the consumers.  In some cases, some companies have tried to pass a law that would allow them to serve and produce food without having to state where their food came from.  In my opinion this would be a major negative effect on all consumers. This would allow companies not only to decide how consumers will be treated, but also make them even more addicted to their products.
As stated before, behind all this controversy sits the media which takes advantage of such debate to make up stories and help their writing profit.  As seen in the reading, “All news are local” one can see how media reporters and writers customize their stories to appeal to a certain public.  One can see how news reporters draw off in certain events to make their news more popular in certain areas.  In regards to GMO’s, one does not see many underdeveloped citizen bloggers arguing against GMO’s simply because they do not understand the matter or because it is simply not relevant to their societies.  However, one can see how, in developed countries, several people talk and write about genetically modified organisms, simply because they affect, in one way or another, their lives.
Most writers base their articles on juicy stories in which they deal with local citizens.  All news are local, means that they are only relevant to the people that are directly affected.  For an American citizen to read that a child is dying of starvation in Africa does not make any difference, but for the very same American to read that the next time he goes to a fast food stand and the food that he will consume there will affect his health, this may make a difference and hence, he or she will be more interested in reading such a news.
Lastly, it is proper to note that news regarding GMO’s are mainly focused for developed countries, and for the very same reason that they are believed to be harmful to people is that they are such a good story for reporters. They deal directly with the average citizen therefore the media can take advantage of such a controversial matter.  GMO’s not only help food chains to be more profitable but also local news writers to get their stories across to more people. In conclusion, GMO’s need to be controlled in order to protect everyone’s health.

-Santiago Dominguez

Work cited:
R Stanton. All News is Local. Chapter 9&amp; 10: Citizens and Participation &amp; Conclusion. 170-200. Copyright 2007 Richard Stanton.
Nestle, Marion. Food Politics.  UC Press: Berkeley, 2003.  Selected

Read Full Post »